Jim Scanlon, writing for ‘The Coastal Post’

iroabuchi onwuka


’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’

Jim Scanlon, writing for ‘The Coastal Post’ – June 1999 edition (1) ‘Did Transplanted Chimpanzee Testicles Start AIDS Epidemic in 1920’….? -, a question about one, a possible link between HIV and the testis, which is a view that dominated the early experiments on the study of the virus, where the full measure of the resources involved, leads the essay and Scanlon to the problems of the male testosterone and the attempt at virility. His speculations are however endless and the facts enduring that (2) HIV could have resulted from animals, arguing that ‘…Chimpanzees from Central Africa are origin of HIV’, an argument that is central to the dissent over HIV, and like vaccination - if not through vaccination, Africa as the origins of HIV is peculiar, it is also important. We agree only to some degree that there are reasons why Africa had to be the origins of HIV; for sure reasons exist as to why HIV is ridden to mufti-origin and if we thaw through the processes, it may reduce the fatal theoretical flaws leading to some of the failures with HIV experimentation. Scanlon displays his own reporting flair by comparing enduring classics on HIV, including a circulating note (2b) concerning, “One famous author even pinpointed the person responsible for the spread of AIDS in the United States to a French Canadian Flight Attendant.” The infamous story look to support the claim that the virus migrated from Central Africa to the United States through flight attendants and missionaries visiting Africa from Europe and then reverts to Africa sometime later osculating HIV I, II, III, and the theory is important because of the link to Polio Virus where scientist spent a lot of time.  There are however other serious, spurious new theories about HIV and human testicles, which has remain a theme in the market for the long time, and which resurfaced as a corollary to the incident of Ebola and it generate the highest leaning that the emphasis on the general theory of HIV is useful, that Ebola is comparable to pathology or HIV is indicative of what could possible result from the comparative nature of the VIRUS, including the degree of HIV’s audacity, showing departures and travel routes from one village in Africa to another. How to separate the theory from institutional theories is prove that the searching minds of academic majors on HIV may be betrayed by popular theories. It is certain that a lengthy discussion and possibly dissent exist between those who found reason to accept that HIV virus as a product of male testosterone and experiments that it is blind to argue that there was not searching for the roles of seminal fluids and spermatozoa. It is the life in the sperm and the living structure of creatures that widen the fact that a damage o immune system is perhaps systemic; perhaps ‘endemic’ may or may not have to do with living biological life similar to Ebola. It is has to be pointed out that the primary houses of Luc Montaigne and Robert Gallo including Simone Francoise on the routes of HIV follow – emphasis the particular nature of the proteins, that it is a historical disputable institutional idea which was academically achieved by Gallo, that there was something useful with a virus that could surprise a patient in the later stages,  using as others pointed out a strain of Zaire’s monkey Interleukin which configured for HIV in many ways than one with emphasis on thymus, which has been demonstrated as a candidate for transferring the original structure of the Virus from primates to Human and somewhere along the lines of transfer, new life arose from the DNAs and proved nearly difficult to overcome. This approach is mechanical, close to our views on the subject, but perhaps wrong on the nature of DNA and the failures of the body to manage radical proteins – which are bi-product as from Amino acids which is inhibit the gene. Such argument died a sudden death when it was not possible to show that all oncogenic viruses from human and primates from Zaire’s or Congo reproduce any hints of Immune Deficiency in human beings. It further suffered several other problems when the strain proved deleterious and cancerous possibly due to the same reasons why epigenetic methylation suffers from biological theoretical acceptance. We may or may not have even seen the end with Ebola virus since it is considered latent virus, which means that its impact on the human body is rapid and constant and usually perhaps operate like Influenza or Flu. Whereas HIV is not considered latent virus rather visna-like or slow virus (lent-virus), its presence in the human body is recognized by obvious signs of cold cases, and other cold-related symptoms which may or may differ from cold virus but may suggest like Ebola that other things are happening to the body.