Detroit (fiv

by

sampson i. onwuka

(2) Reconsideration

The only short wave analysis of this sort of expression is Frege's mathematical 'continuum' as opposed

to Pierce, is opposed to Riemann integral (integrable) within a fixed absolute value of a graph and closes

1%. Quantum Physics points that the connection between indexing of 1 to percentage parity of 1% is not

exactly feasible and therefore only limited to one experimental exercise, that going with due respect to

density and excitation of the elements or atomic molecules, that measurements are off to degree that

both the self-replicating Fermi-Dirac matrix (String) and Bosie-Einstein matrix may require addition

Sympletic measures beyond the first interval largely for the misleading rate of returns of a stock that is

either falling or stock that is rising. If the stocks are in decline it generally wipes away more profit than

the rate of profit from an initial propulsion….given that in continues moving matrix of heat and

temperature that eigenvalue experiences less amplitude and therefore estimable with particular respect

to temperature - continuous and discontinuous application of heat as from Lagrande experiment using

temperature is theoretically discontinuous, whereas the atomic structure of elements may not

necessarily conform the 1% movement of the manifold to 1 index since the elements are already fixed in

their formal states and therefore rotate slightly away from the estimable.

Feyman is quite important as far Pendulum is concerned. It must be mentioned that in Physics, in

mathematics, the law that an, “…inversely relationship between the length of a pendulum and its

frequency” is the product of Feyman. This statement is correct since it also makes clear that the

mathematics associated with exponential relationships with time exist in geometry, that for instance,

that the surface of an object is proportional to the square of linear dimensions. The main point from

physics quantum mechanics associated with Feyman’s ‘functional integral formalism’ is that at each

stress of a pendulum across a given axis are series of spaces affected in time over the stretch of a given

swing of a pendulum. Feyman is also associated with stating that the distance covered by a pendulum or

the angle established by a pendulum, does not repeat the same angle in an amplitude. That is “Path

Integral Formulation’ which is credited to Feyman, which has existed before Newton.

Arguing against Feyman’s ‘functional integral formalism’, Wheeler states that “Because it is the essence

of quantum mechanics that all field histories contribute to the probability amplitude, the sum…not only

may contain doubly and multiply connected metric, it must do so.”

"The parts" as they say "is not more than the whole." and when we add all parts of the functional

pendulum across an amplitude, we generally have a number more than the total distance covered by a

single to and from and a single amplitude. Part of the reasons that Feyman gave for this sort of

occurrence is that the distance between one tick of the length of a pendulum is a equal to the one space

in time, and the total angle made by the length across an axis shows that in one seems like one

amplitude, there are several degrees of angles and spaces, that there are possible alternate universes

each existing in one singular thrust of universes – at least for measure of mathematically reduced

amplitude, each not. It is exoteric thinking to create the argument that between the two adjacent sides

of right angles triangle and

We may suggest here as where, that the rate of change of money is part velocity, but the rate of change

with respect duration of even log 10 bases point, explains the decay rate. Of Course half–life of most

durable product is a guarantee for mortgage that a piece of real estate is worth half the price when it

matures. Usually the buyers can fulfil the obligation by paying off the mortgage within duration and can

exercise option. Optimality is not the rate of change and posterior angel; rather, we may indicate that

this is very really the case in any mortgage with fixed income as such in forward economy when flipping

of houses are commissary, buyers can opt out at a bargain. We look at this decay rate from vintage of

permanent money, perhaps with understanding that a savings at the present market rate or going rate is

no guarantee of future profit or wealth bequeathing, that market conditions are perpetual motion and

therefore change with rate of information, that the rate of information constitute the momentum or

stochastic – the flow rate.

That even at the rate derived elsewhere, fundamental basis point amount to difficult execution of

process, but in limelight, it transforms the economic landscape and investor confidence and explicates

the rate of transition between one point on the graph and another, easing off different across the burn

in time graph – for instance a slope on a graph showing range – or in time, it is conforms some of the

basic assumption between the initial shock to a system dynamic and in ascription of Lucas – the duration

of the stock or the rate at which it is free as one time even within, mitigating or fulfilling a bias – and the

end of the shock best explicated through its ability to show hints of future occurrences. That is the

hallmark – whether the impact was felt more at the beginning, at the middle or at the end of a shock. It

will be considered theoretical to compare these assumptions through other means that what happens

when we isolate a beginning of movement and end in real time market situation. It will be considered

theoretical to consider these punctuated departures in a progression time management across a

boarder of duration or specific time as Cycles with hints of disequilibrium.

In usual context, as we have discussed Keynes matron for cycles in businesses or anti-cyclical

mathematical models, which econometrics establish as ridden to both the endogenous and exogenous

and the rate defines the supply option from highest or M3 business institution. In forward, the demand

aggregate ratio or propensity creates what I re-define as momentum or domino effect or balancing act

from expended institutional involvement such as Government spending, what Keynes may have missdefined

given his expected effect understated through the supply rate as a pacifier for investor

confidence pursuance to healthy credit line than overall GDP which is usually slowly.

That it is demand aggregate that solution short depreciation rate in nearly all economy, to a point that a

Kenneth Arrow’s definition of X, Y, Z export concept requiring sacrificing one of the terms to fulfil half

equal of the full of concept, may patronizing a Pareto partial equilibrium of acting in one specific area to

another, but may fulfill the expected momentum required to meet the demand curve or enhance the

recovery rate without addition supply –inflation monetary injection to any system dynamic. In context of

M2, proposed and defended by Friedman and Schwartz, it is averse to inflation and recovery rate is

towards the end of shocks – hence a Laffer’s curve disposed of tax incentive. Investment, it may seem

that supply of money to a system meets the demand issues half, but between cents by digit expenditure

of the least amount of money – OMNI BUS – or otherwise or OMNI bus, that meets the current market

condition, the higher the plausible rate of inflation and over-value currency.

Either side of the investment curve, even from debt; do not exactly define the basic answer to the most

demanding problems of economic debility or financial crisis, that the both sides of the exercises

patronizing irrational expectation in the market, define market conditions and credit rate which most

economist will easily advise any seating head of state – and they are usually right. I state that Detroit

Case should be consider through regional economic vintage points, that in the even that a recovery was

proved possible through additional spending only, through debt cancellation in other to qualify for more

borrowing, that the application of digit saving rate and glut to system dynamic was a guarantee that

could encourage the investment, that each of these combine separately or together in achieving basic

assumptions of debt and recovery towards as example of how to mitigate decline in any economy and

when and if happens, what these economies will lose. What we treat is the matter arising from placing

investment forward in liquid or illiquid economic environment such as a case for Detroit, that the

recovery may be clearly reviewed from partial equilibrium complex that in the context X, Y, Z, and

investment should beginning with the best for instance an X, then to Y which is expected to redeem Z –

even if the budget as expected goes through, that X, Y, leading to a Z, is a momentum that redeems the

Z, improving the call ratio and ensuring in-money bonds with or without guarantee. It follows that a well

exercise option in the primary and basic form of NAIRU, aids forward on the rate of decay and price

value which does not hold any water when other information is poured into system.

Kevin Philips once mentioned that Corporate Downsizing was a short term duration which undercut the

prevailing financial products towards the…that wealth exist “wealth exists in an international rather

than just a national contexts’’ and in terms of the dynamic associated with Detroit, it was from its

earliest beginning an International City. It was a hotbed of European contingent business collaborative

led by France but in persons and ideas, it was Germany and its descendants that divided the rivers in

Detroit. Some had wondered why the French were dislocated about Detroit knowing full well that the

total expectations of the Americans and theirs at the turn of the 19th century resolved around the total

others, and France of all people were pretended to be the defenders of what they call ‘brotherhood’ of

man. But the social rift in Detroit and in Michigan was not necessarily born from English and German

divide, that in spite of the poor communication between the severing group, it is was first language in

the Poor House of Detroit and in Dearborn that sparked the poor language delivery and it widened over

time embracing the menace to live at the expense of others. It is not clear if and when race became a

factor in Detroit, but it seems that the Aryan Philosophy which from all recorded history and archeology

was not necessarily driven by race but tribe took on added and colorful meaning in foreign ground and

in Michigan and Ohio, it was felt bitterly. It needs be said that the theory that the In Detroit there were

not enough black on the onset as erroneous as the misinformation of Chicago’s demographic that simply

excluded Blacks from the population. The Midwestern sickness gives all wrong reasons why

The German broad spectacularly entered the phase of money from the turn of the 19th century and

baited against the founders of the State, the French, there was simply the defense dynamics of survival

which was common with poor and pedestrian societies which is badly received in the overall history of

Michigan and was reduced to housing by many analyst. But the conflict did reach its full potential until

the Industrial age, and the relapse of the society into cycles of financial competency erased the

manumissions of earlier pioneers. For sure the International Status of Detroit – not unlike Baltimore,

proved its worth in investing crowd that followed their types in the end of the 19th century, and in short

summary, it is the coming of these others from Europe – and others for instance the Blacks to Detroit

that regurgitated the divided past – at least their presence partially regurgitated the past and their

uptake of Detroit began with the new and profound necessity of the era of New Deal and the Welfare

economy that was concomitant with it.

To be fair, US – like many industrial nations of the 19th century had reserves of their ‘proletariat’ and

with the capitalist ridden society, it was usually a witness to the issues of poor houses. There is

uncertainty in philosophy of utility, but in terms of the obligations and the decision function of the ruling

class, it is an equation XY, where X unlike Kenneth Arrow equations (Arrow-Pratt) will not meet Y. That

the linearity of X in respect to Y will not permit a Lagrangian option for future utility which from normal

reaction as from Fisher’s ‘salability’, a certain future gains from extremes of interest may for future

reasons be sacrificed.

In principle, the mast of Detroit Optimal Utility function from the 19th centuries onwards was in essence

cast with a hint of paschal theory of self-love, a form of parochial Hogan mythology that others also

identify with Adam Smith but now brought to bear in the redeeming majority of the one and the neglect

of the probably others. The Michigan Lakes and the connecting routes to parts of Milwaukee and

Chicago under the thumb of the rising majority and foresight been the gut of precaution may or may not

have persuaded the Whites or European Americans that competitive environment of the City of Detroit

a ‘realm’ had to be protected. But this idea of individual or collective survival forgot to incorporate the

possibility of losing the City to others, a case not unlike what we find in South Africa.

And that some equilibrium of income plus savings to consumption and expanses will essentially even

out. But there is a disequilibrium when the emergent properties of nature such as Earthquake and such

as epidemics from large new population, compel expenses from the government, we experience a

relapse into Insurance which usually covers existing variable such as X, Y, Z, of savings but still gaps

between expected yield or profit with time needing to be breached by the new and emergent properties

of disasters as new debt assumptions in active life of a budgetary income. Such scenario creates the

problem of disequilibrium when going forward resources are not allocated to meet the initial goals but

diverted to the redeeming of the new demands will therefore force additional knocks on a system

dynamic, may lead to force a period of comparison between taxes and gross domestic product, which

may in practice satisfy partial Pareto of offsetting a set of the general equilibrium that is optimal to

satisfy that X, Y, is expedient to the sacrifice of z.

Kenneth Arrow's explicating of Lagrange and Lange, may be used in meeting the demands of the Interdependent

market condition whereas assumed that the resources are limited and therefore a

government must decide which of the projects are most demanding. But here we can still widen that the

gaps in Arrow's analogy is that any investor involved in the decision making process of three stimuli, x, y,

z, would not necessarily suffer himself or herself in fulfilling the x, y, z, that Russian GLOBUS theorem

may be modeled after Walras 'general equilibrium', that the mathematically formulas of Pareto is saved

by the more practical X of Y of Arrow, that the price movement strategy or momentum of X, Y, Z,

suggest that a part of Arrow’s simplicity fails to incorporate momentum which in markets if not in

Physics is very important. Here we can demonstrate that as x as if an object - perhaps a card placed

within distance of Y, and Z, within torching distance of Y, that all laws that satisfies a domino effect and

momentum will point that neither partial or general equilibrium is useful since the total force applied on

the X is demonstrated through to the Z by x, y direction, and always equal to zero hence a positive

convexity facing North. That is x, y, z are placed to equal placing and in direction of choice, that the force

applied to x, torches y, that whether z is preferred or not, it must natural obey the direction of the x, y,.