HIV (4)

(Opon Auto...
--Sampson i. Onwuka

To manage the cycle of information which does not die easy WITH hiv, some of the early claims about the (viruses) and about the infections need to be revisited, need to be drawn. The question need to be asked is what really happened during periods of great pandemics such as cold and periods of epidemics such as flu-virus? One of the more enduring theatrical on the relevant episodes of the last century is the story of DNA structure and the account of the discoveries of Aino Acid through (A) James Watson (b) Francis Crick (2) Account of the DNA DISCOVERIES – Alpha Helix, Haemoglobin – Linus Pauling/Sickle Cells Insulin (Diabetes), Insulin - Jacques Monod, E. Coli Phage Diabetes, Oswald Avery (S-strain, Streptococcus, E Coli Phage Virus….Vaccination – John Enders, James Salk, Albert Sabin, Tuberculosis, Another contentious is the issue as the experimental cadre about the avoid evolution and its anthropology theories – for a fact the virus is argued to have origins in other creatures – it manages to sustain the experiment of vaccination – creating the intelligence for the life structures of proteins and the profligate behavior of the virus and its use expands the contagion of role of oxygen --- which in part expands the role of enzyme. E Coli phage bacteria – the profligate behavior of E.coli naturally involves the reduction of sugar – they feed on sugar molecules thereby preventing the normal molecule structure of the Carbon ( ) DNA especially thymus – if the E. Coli attaches to Staphylococcus bacteria – attaches itself – thymus it does so with intent on feeding up to the sugar – thereby creating, a primacy base for DNA with or without response to the immunity of the host, including the enzyme or protein that can replace the role of thymus – the role of oxygen in the blood build, the formative role of blood cells – white blood cells and the red blood cells and how the spleen help the rest of the body.

Man, Darwin argued, began his very existence by the will to live, by building a defense against intrusion. It result is a creature that first started crawling, then squatting before a full human beings. Darwin attempted to buttress his argument (but to blunder) by citing changes in human beings and their environment over a long and inaccessible period of time, sometimes through 'mutations of species', a condition which is proven then and now as abiotic and deleterious. The case of seasonal human cold virus and bacteria is why there is new need for vaccination against influenza every year. It is true that can some diseases are reasonable associated with a variety of people in the world, and are associated with various groups of regions and specie types, but these diseases are not particularly limited to our kind, or a specie, to the degree that DNA has successfully replaced the idea of mutational changes, it is only common sense that proteins and its quality which are the main reasons for biological changes in the body and why we differ from each, explains the reasons why viruses and bacteria familiar isolated for specific diseases were successfully based on the outer-coating of the viruses and bacteria. As such the coat enables specific roles of the restriction enzymes towards the splicing and replacing of DNA and the implication when each of the Phosphate strand is the complex. The region that the restriction occurs in both bacteria and viruses, and the permeation of the bacteria and their viruses is a fascination that is explicable through the Random DNA Mutation but which should merit additional studies largely for the precision information available today, and also for the inherited bias associated with Darwin’s theories, that for instance evolution of human beings may be specific to certain regions of the world, and alternately over time as people travelled around the world, they became specific to these environment. I am convinced that based on the information available to the best of us, that the various schools on HIV may lead us into several directions but using my line of theory and school essentially, that the origination of the virus is perhaps ridden to the actions of two possible RNA, perhaps from two different male, damaged by virus and given new life through rectum. The focal point is the new life of HIV – which are enucleated through DNA of the host body, passed to the male – in this case – no female for reasons I have explained involved SRY and humans default male - and therefore the second male and possible not the organ gave a living and active life to the virus called HIV – immune to the host in the DNA of another and therefore immune to medical treatment and vaccination.

To help many scientist forge a basic theory on how HIV work, they adapted themselves to major Laboratories – struggling (1) a difference between company names and lab specific with HIV. They encountered also different schools and who were primarily concerned on how HIV evolve – Cavendish London and the issue of Alpha Helix, labs versus institution, where the early years of the HIV virus brought the reputation of Cavendish to some end. It does not seem clear that the major dissent over HIV which continues today is how theories on evolution (Thomas Malthus /Darwin – Mendel, English School --- Wallace Huxley --- Richard Hawkins) influenced their lives, and how the portrait of Africa as perhaps terminus in quo for HIV or SIV(?). Although there are reasons to add outsiders such as Kreb – Kreb circle, Alexander Edward Jenner – who are primarily English, as opposed to proto-schools of evolutions August Wisemann --- Robert Koch, Hans Spelman, Ernst Mayer and the best of us (author) who believed that Darwin was wrong – at least in some of his theories concerning life forms emerging from still smaller forms. In essence, there are hardly reasons why HIV differ from each, or hardly any reasons why there is over 200 prototypes of HIV and SIV (1-40) – than the fact that it is believed to have been evolved – practically out of Africa where primitive life forms are not explicated. The difficulty is promoting the flaws in evolution or the problems of heredity which was believed to have been the course of proteins – as through Mendel, or the consensus of opinion in biology achieved in 30’s through the latter half of the 50’s where the theories of Amino acid brought down the house on human genes and the transfer of chromosomes from one parent to another. It is not easy to break these schools as important in our studies of HIV and in how HIV meet the rest of us – even in the light of Beatrice Khan, that these schools of even Gallo and Montaigner were useful but were destined to collapse. How certain sickness arise from viruses and bacteria – particularly HIV is not new biology, but how some life forms are possible even in the last stages of the human development is not impossible to demonstrate. It does not nearly make the best of us accept that HIV couldn’t have come from Africa, or couldn’t have come from Europe or Asia, that all “things being equal”, there are cases of dangerous viruses that emerge from continents, especially Africa, that the house that Darwin built is not without weakness, it must collapse on surer foundation that HIV defied all.

There are other schools that rely effectively on transmission of HIV, especially during sexual contact, through and during “pregnancy ----drug use – injection – sharing needle, and “Occupational exposure – professional hazard, especially through “Blood transfusion with emphasis on Homosexual case and statistics….Opinions of the public raised by an author,.,

1987 (19) Encephalopathy, dementia, HIV-Related (20) Mycobacterium tuberculosis any site (extra-pulmonary) (21) Wasting Syndrome, HIV related and HIV antibodies required. (22) Coccidiomycosis, disseminated or extrapulmonary (23) Cryptococcosis, extra pulmonary (24) Cytomegalovirus, other than liver, spleen, or nodes (25) Cytomegalovirus retinitis (26) Salmonella septicemia, recurrent, Protozoal and heliminthis infections (1) Cryptosporidiosis, intestinal, causing diarrhea for more than a month (2) Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (3) Strongyloidosis, causing pneumonia, central nervous system infection, or disseminated infection (4) Toxoplasmosis, causing pneumonia or central nervous system infection. Fungal Infection (5) Candidiasis, causing esophagitis (6) Cryptococcosis, causing central nervous system or disseminated infection, Bacterial infection (7) “Atypical” mycobacteriosis, causing disseminated infection, Viral Infection (8) Cytomegalovirus, causing pulmonary, gastrointestinal tract, or central nervous system infection(9) Herpes simplex virus, causing chronic mucocutaneous infection with ulcers persisting more than one month or pulmonary, gastrointestinal tract, or disseminated infection (10) Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (presumed to be caused by a papovavirus)

The virus classes which can cause opportunistic infection leading to a possible death are namely, CMVs, VZNs, Hepatitis B or C, other mutations of HIV, and the world famous class of Virus called EBVs or the Epstein Barr Viruses and of the most susceptible class of viruses that are linked to HIV including the Ebola viruses which are B cell dominated, affected Gorilla whose blood types were mainly B group and the latter a by-product of the intricate activity of the immunogenic b cells. The CMVs are called after the Cytomegalovirus and are mainly characterized by the attempt to selectively and inductively oppose the magnificence of T-cells or Thymus-depended Cells, and the VZNs (Varicella-Zoster Virus) are from public and open information sources called Small-Pox and Shingles in older adults but are curable by introducing a self-inhibiting baby virus which in forms familiar with us as Cow Pox or Chicken poxes can achieve vaccination. It is the height of science to devise an end through its means; an approach to medicine that proves a poison its own antidote and removes the confusion from a replicate two RNA as a DNA. But such effort has failed with HIV for unlike these attacks to a site in the cell by the a chemical T-cells inhibiting cytokines and the Cytochrome which may cause Cancers or Sarcomas induced by Viruses or in terms of Kaposi’s Sarcomas growing out of problems associated with repressed immunology leading to its toxicity and cancer site like in plant’s Tobacco Mosaic, HIV proved itself a match for the development of the medicine required to overcome the lapses in human immunology due to the comparative relational to the complex of Thymine, protein called CD4s, fond of the CD4s which explains the weakness of the virus. Excessive intake of immunogenic drugs may yield a form of resistance to both auto immune CD4s and other drugs with intent on helping. The bi-products such as Triglycerides are perhaps the most notable example of the strange case of fat induced drugs. A heart disease may not be that far from excess repository of facts in the body, or the poor delivery system of a protease dependent hormonal lymphocyte or a lipoprotein E, that is connected to loss of memory whereas e4 is associated with Alzheimer.

In the case of 1980’s diagnoses with HIV and homosexual male and female, there are issues of lifestyle which account for some of the depletion in health, or immune deficiency, from excessive use of recreational drugs. Prime reason for recreational drugs is the release of protein enzymes including dopamine, or for steroid users; cortisol, that unsheathe oxygen bearing red cells that alters sugar complexes creating a collapse of the cells and a shaken syndrome or cold. This depresses control factors, one of which is dry lips or the chemical repression is not far from the enzymes that are bi-product known bacteria or viruses, one of which is Candidiasis. These men had a lifestyle that included recreational drugs Distempers that it was a new virus that caused AIDS, when perhaps the virus was perhaps pre-existing. HIV virus does not seem to be pre-existing as such, does not mean that new virus is not dangerous to human beings, does not mean that HIV do not pre-exist, does not mean that it cannot easily arise, leads my argument that it possibly evolved two radical proteins, or RNAs. Randy Shilts interest in public discourse is the failures of public health alternators and orgs., to reach for the new cases of pandemic. In several disciplines of health business and insurance at the turn of the 80’s, the focus on recovery and treatment was not primary expectations of the general American towards a better understanding of the Virus and it overpowers the immune system. Such circles of diseased conditions are routinely parallel to human existence on one hand, and are especially in time of HIV. Unlike leprosy and the social contagion of physically visible conditions, HIV of our time does not show until late in its development. For that the newly infected may suffer initial spells of cold and fever chills, or other forms of minor rashes and headache, but may carry themselves into the latter development of the virions (virons). By this period, the process is long complicated and many others unaware of their status will end up infecting others. The main point is that the spread of HIV is only through the metabolized plasma of the patient and a form or formal DNA usually spur on contact with a second patient.

The general account of HIV involves some of the duct tapes with big corporation considered exceptional in the study of HIV and why – among the major schools on HIV were those who present the description of the virus, its expectation, and the several questions on interpretation of HIV and what is the central dogma given the attempt by earliest scientist to conquer the pandemic. The real question of the virus – is how an agent/organism can adapt to deplete CD4 and PH.D thesis on HIV. Presenting the argument on HIV in such a way that it accommodates the various schools of Luc Montaigne and Robert Gallo, two of whom are among the foremost experts on the subject may defeat the more troubled waters of Peter Deusberg and his colleagues that attempted in the early to mid-90’s to dissuade existing disciplines on the credibility of HIV as a causality for AIDS. There are several effective arguments for both sides, of HIV, that it terms of the subject, we may be careful to adapt to Luc Montagnier largely for the deciding influence of separating and identifying the HIV virus, but also for fostering some of the earliest breakthroughs on HIV, working at some point along with Jonas Salk, Charles Mereuix, Jean Paul Levy, Paul Luciw, Simon Wain, Mika Popovic who was himself the assistant and comrade to Gallo, and the some of the names that has made breakthrough on the subject of HIV, which in his words has become a discipline of his own... book, Virus 1999 fresh from the convictions on isolating the Virus in 1983 and according to him “The study of AIDS has become almost a discipline unto itself. Two important new paths loomed before us; to understand first of all how the virus, by infecting only a few lymphocytes, was able to destroy the whole immune system; and second, to understand better the role of co-factors, mycoplasmas in particular, in the diseases’ development.” The layout was short of proving that mycoplasmas play a deciding role of the virus means to end and may guide through the ‘heroic age’ to the age where we rely on day information HIV.